Inspect 14 primary sources by authority class, jurisdiction and operating control. Every row links to the publisher’s source.
Version 1.1.0. Reviewed through 2026-09-05. The registry is selective and informational, not a global legal census or legal advice.
Showing 14 sources.
| Primary source | Jurisdiction | Authority | Controls addressed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 1: Digital ReplicasU.S. Copyright Office | United States, federal | Government report or guidancePolicy report and recommendations, not enacted law | Permission Specific scope Lifecycle Remedy |
| AB 2602: Contracts against public policy, digital replicasCalifornia Legislature | California, United States | Enacted law or regulationEnacted, applicable to specified new performances fixed on or after January 1, 2025 | Specific scope Remedy |
| AB 1836: Use of likeness, digital replicaCalifornia Legislature | California, United States | Enacted law or regulationEnacted | Permission Remedy |
| ELVIS Act, Public Chapter 588Tennessee General Assembly | Tennessee, United States | Enacted law or regulationEnacted, effective July 1, 2024 | Permission Remedy |
| S.1367: NO FAKES Act of 2025United States Congress | United States, federal | Proposed legislationIntroduced and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, not law as of September 5, 2026 | Permission Specific scope Lifecycle Remedy |
| TAKE IT DOWN Act, Public Law 119-12United States Congress | United States, federal | Enacted law or regulationEnacted as Public Law 119-12; the covered-platform notice-and-removal requirement took effect May 19, 2026 | Permission Lifecycle Remedy |
| Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 50European Union | European Union | Enacted law or regulationEnacted regulation | Disclosure Provenance |
| Report on Copyright and Artificial IntelligenceUK Government | United Kingdom | Government report or guidanceGovernment report with a separate digital-replicas consultation announced | Permission Remedy |
| Artificial Intelligence under the 2025 Commercials ContractSAG-AFTRA | Covered United States commercials work | Collective agreementCollective agreement guidance | Permission Specific scope Compensation Asset control Lifecycle |
| 2026 Theatrical and Television Memorandum of AgreementSAG-AFTRA | Covered United States television and theatrical work | Collective agreementCollective agreement with some phased provisions | Permission Specific scope Compensation Asset control Lifecycle |
| Interactive Digital Replicas and ConsentSAG-AFTRA | Covered United States interactive-media work | Collective agreementCollective agreement guidance | Permission Specific scope Compensation Lifecycle |
| FTC Endorsement Guides: What People Are AskingFederal Trade Commission | United States, federal | Government report or guidanceFederal advertising guidance | Compensation Disclosure |
| NIST AI 100-4: Reducing Risks Posed by Synthetic ContentNational Institute of Standards and Technology | United States, technical guidance | Government report or guidanceTechnical report | Disclosure Provenance |
| C2PA Content Credentials specification 2.4Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity | International technical standard | Technical standardTechnical specification version 2.4 | Provenance Lifecycle |
No sources match these filters. Clear a filter or inspect the complete dataset.
Published versions remain identifiable. A later update must retain its reviewed-through date, describe added or changed sources and recompute every count from the released data. Corrections are recorded rather than silently replacing the research history.
| Version | Published | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2026-09-04 | Initial release with 12 primary sources, eight operating controls, methodology, JSON and CSV distributions. |
| 1.1.0 | 2026-09-05 | Added the enacted TAKE IT DOWN Act and SAG-AFTRA interactive digital-replica guidance, and updated C2PA from specification 2.2 to 2.4. |
Send a source-status or coding correction to founders@socialgravity.ai. Include the source URL and the field you believe should change.
No. It is a transparent, bounded registry of selected primary sources. The methodology lists the inclusion rules and limitations.
No. Authority class and status remain separate, so proposed legislation is not presented as enacted law.
It means the source expressly addresses that topic under the published coding definition. It does not make the source universally applicable.
The source or coding issue is reviewed against the primary publication. Material corrections are recorded in the released change history.